MFC is the C++ wrapper to Windows API. It was a great help when moving from DOS to Windows where the Windows API required a new mind set.
Now it’s WPF age, WFP/XAML is another big mind set change. Acropolis came to help this time. Its wizard askes something like “Do you want SDI or MDI?” and “Do you want menu bar, tool bar and status bar?”. They are famous questions in MFC wizard.
Add comment December 6th, 2007
Just saw a demo of ASP.NET MVC by Jeffrey Palermo on DevTeach Vancouver. The demo used StructureMap to construct the controller DI/IoC way, but actually key point of this framework is the “URL routing handler” that maps URL request to controller class’ method. The mapping is configurable and has intelligence to map automatically by parameter.
It somehow reminds me ISAPI Extension. In Delphi, it was as easy as adding a WebAction component, set path then code in the OnAction event which usually calls methods in another controller class…
The second key point is the “RenderView” method from base class Controller. It invokes aspx as a template engine. The result is that view state, server side event are no more available.
To me, ASP.NET MVC is as same as Web Client Software Factory that I will not jump on immediately.
Add comment November 30th, 2007
Attended Jeremy D. Miller’s session about design patterns for WinForms where I finally learnt the differences between supervising controller and passive view.
As myself being a fan of “Presentation Model” and data binding, especially two-way data binding, I am glad to know from Jeremy that “Presentation Model is another name for the Model/View/ViewModel pattern being promoted by some of the WPF team at Microsoft.” from his presentation of his blog post.
Update on 12/5/2007: Acropolis, the WPF client application framework is really using the presentation model explained in this video presentation.
Add comment November 30th, 2007
Before, my guidance to developers is to avoid post and try always GET.
This rule now changed. All because of the UpdatePanel which essentially dose partial page updates.
Started to like post back because only post back, not GET will work with UpdatePanel.
Add comment June 26th, 2007
Too many debates are there about SOAP vs. REST, contract first vs. code first.
But here is my real life experience during developing WB Editor when it needs to connect web services through those famous RESTful style APIs.
First, the API documents usually have no schema definitions other than request and response XML examples. Examples are good for human to read. But after reading, where is the code that I can work with? I have to write code to parse those XML! - This is a pain. If there was schema, machine could generate client code stubs automatically. The nice “Add web reference” way.
Second, maybe the web service providers realized the issue mentioned above. Usually there are client libraries are also available, such as libraries for Java, for .NET, for PHP, for Python and for Javascript …. If using libraries, what is the differece between them to those C libraries ages ago? As long as the the library black box can talk to the server no needs to bother whether underneath it is HTTP, whether it is XML or binary.
I cannot imagine if in my company, when I publishing tones of web services to other departments or clients, I have to also deliver client libraries, for Java, for .NET ….
Tags: WB Editor, SOAP, REST, API, schema, Add web reference, web services
Add comment June 8th, 2007
No needs to rename every control from something like textBox1 to txtTitle 
, because no more code like:
txtTitle.Text = article.Title;
article.Title = txtTitle.Text;
How much time can we save if there are 20 controls on the screen?
Add comment May 20th, 2007
Google AJAXSLT is an implementation of XSL-T in JavaScript, intended for use in fat web pages, which are nowadays referred to as AJAX applications. Because XSL-T uses XPath, it is also an implementation of XPath that can be used independently of XSL-T.
Selenium Core uses AJAXSLT’s XPath function to locate element on plain html. Selenium IDE can generate the XPath very much same as Solvent.
Here is a sample to extracting data from a web page using XPath using AJAXSLT.
<html><head>
<title>XPath-Test</title>
<script language=”JavaScript” type=”text/javascript” src=”xpath/misc.js”></script>
<script language=”JavaScript” type=”text/javascript” src=”xpath/dom.js”></script>
<script language=”JavaScript” type=”text/javascript” src=”xpath/xpath.js”></script>
<script language=”JavaScript” type=”text/javascript”>
function findElementUsingFullXPath(xpath, inDocument) {
var context = new ExprContext(inDocument);
var xpathObj = xpathParse(xpath);
var xpathResult = xpathObj.evaluate(context);
if (xpathResult && xpathResult.value) {
return xpathResult.value[0];
}
return null;
};
function start() {
alert(findElementUsingFullXPath(“//*[.='b']“, window.document).innerHTML);
}
</script>
</head>
<body onload=”start()”>
<div><p>aaaaa</p>test<div>bb</div><a>b</a></div>
</body>
</html>
Add comment May 16th, 2007
One of the Mix07 presentation mentioned VBx along the Ruby and Python. I realized immediately it must be something interesting.
While searching related staff, I also found this diagram.
Add comment May 6th, 2007
Most popular blog servers/engines such as WordPress, Drupal, Neclues and etc. are using RDS (Really Simple Discovery) to help client software like WB Editor to find the services that can be used to retrieve, modified and delete the blog posts.
Those blog servers/engines are also generating RDF (Resource Description Framework) for each blog post to give more information about the post, e.g. track back url. But not enough. I am looking for,
Here are some interesting references:
Add comment May 6th, 2007
Smart Client Software Factory team is recommending the “Model View Presenter” pattern. They have created Guidance Package for using this pattern.
From my experience, the “Presentation Model” pattern is better. When I asked if SC-SF can also include Guidance Package for PM, it looks like people may think MVP is more suitable for unit tests than PM. Read this thread.
To me, PM is even easier for unit testing, because it is less coupled.
I have refactored the CAB Smart Part Quick Start project to use MVP and PM patterns and have also created unit test projects for comparison.
Source Code:
They can be added to the CAB Smart Part Quick Start solution.
Add comment June 14th, 2006
In my previous post, I refactored CAB Smart Part Quick Start project to use Presentation Model. This time I refactored the project to use Model View Presenter. Note: the Presenter class is borrowed from Smart Client Software Factory, SC-SF.
Download: Source for PM, Source for MVP
They can be added to Smart Part QuickStart Solution for comparison.
The difference is that in MVP the presenter uses the interfaces to push data into the views. That presenter refers to views. In PM, views pull data from the presentation model. Views refer to pm via interface. The pm implements the interfaces. Personally,
I prefer PM to MVP. I successfully used the PM pattern in several projects.
My thougths are,
What esstentially MVP and PM do is to take the state and behavior of the presentation out of view. The views are dumb. They do nothing other than data binding and bypass user inputs.
But in MVP, although it splits one “autonomous View” into two parts, actually presenter and view are logically one thing, physically two class. When adding a new view, a new presenter is required.
In PM, it is a decoupled structure. Presentation model has no idea about view(s). It just holds the state and raise events. Adding new views needs no changes to the PM. View can also choose to connect different presentation model.
The Smart Client Software Factory recommand MVP over PM, “The rationale behind MVP as implemented in SC-SF is to encourage unit testing …” Read this thread.
So, I created two projects for the two patterns. Next I will try to unit tests for them to see.
Add comment May 19th, 2006
Composite UI Application Block (CAB) is really a powerful framework for smart client applications. It comes with samples implementing the Model View Control (MVC) pattern and the Model View Presenter (MVP) pattern. There is actually a third pattern called Presentation Model. See the pictures from http://jgoodies.com/articles/patterns-and-binding.pdf.
As described in Martin Fowler’s article (MVP, PM), the presenter in MVP has no state and the views need to provide interface allow presenter to manipulate them. The Presentation Model holds and synchronizes the state, but no need to create view interfaces.
Choice between MVP and PM, as per Martin Fowler’s article:
Compare to MVC or MVP, I prefer using the Presentation Model, because it has a centralized place to store state/data and centralized event source to notify views to update themselves. The CAB’s Event Broker is perfect for notification. So I modified the Smart Part Quick Start Project to become the ”Presentation Model” pattern. Here is the Source code.
What have I done?
* Extract interface from the views sound very much similar to MVP, isn’t it? The difference is that in MVP, the presenter uses the interfaces to push data into the views, means that presenter refers to views. In PM, the controller implements the interface. The views pull data from the controller, means that views refer to controller. The “refer to” is a very good case of using depedency injection.
**
public class CustomerPresentationModel: ICustomerDetailView, ICustomerListView
{
}
***
public partial class CustomerListView : TitledSmartPart
{
private ICustomerListView controller = null;
[ServiceDependency(Required = true, Type = typeof(CustomerPresentationModel))]
public ICustomerListView Controller
{
set { controller = value; }
}
….
}
Tags: smart client Composite UI Application Block MVC Model View Presenter Presentation Model injection
1 comment May 15th, 2006
继续 VSLive Toronto 的后续故事。 上次记录了 SQL/e，这次是关于 Daniel Cazzulino 的发言 《Microsoft p&p ObjectBuilder》。听完这个演讲发现最近周围的事情还都发生了些关联。
首先是日前买了本书 《Head Up Design Patterns》。它的第一章就以一个引人入胜的故事介绍了设计模式的 Strategy Pattern。这个模式的好处多多，但是负作用是会产生了很多相互关联的类。如何按照合理地创建这些类，并把它们组和起来。这就引出了另外一个话题 Inversion of Control / Dependency Injection。
这几天帮女儿复习准备乐理考试，还碰到了 Interval Inversion / Triad Inversion，搞得我就很头昏。Dependency Injection 好像还好理解些。
Daniel Cazzulino 讲的 ObjectBuilder 就是一个具有 dependency injection 功能的轻量级对象容器*。 ObjectBuilder 是 ＭＳ patterns & practices Composite UI Application Block 以及 Enterprise Library 的核心部分。
这就又引到了 CAB - Composite UI Application Block。也是不久前 WB Editor 3.0 的设计已经开始了。鉴于 2.0 版本中 RAD 流毒太深**，决定应该采用个好的系统结构，正在犹豫，是否用这篇 Implement a Microsoft Word-like Object Model for Your .NET Framework Application 文章介绍的方法呢，还是用 CAB。
经过聆听 Daniel Cazzulino 的讲解，不但了解了 OB 的功能，还了解了其内部的一些机制。因此决定进一步学习了一下 CAB Hands on Lab。于是得到结论就是 WB Editor 3.0 将采用 CAB。
Daniel Cazzulino 还讲了个有用的内容，Guidance Automation Toolkit / GAT，值得再用一篇笔记介绍。
* 轻量级对象容器和 ** RAD 流毒也可以讲些故事。
Tags: VSLive ObjectBuilder Strategy Pattern Inversion of Control Dependency Injection Composite UI Application Block CAB RAD
1 comment May 14th, 2006
在 VSLive Toronto 上见到两个人物，Steve Lasker 和 Daniel Cazzulino
Steve Lasker 介绍了使用 SQL Server Everywhere 的 Occasionally Connected Systems。 SQL Server Everywhere(SQL/e) 何须人也？原来2-4年前做 Pocket PC 程序就相识，那时它叫 SQL Server CE，后来又叫 SQL Server Mobile。 Visual Studio 2005 带的 SQL Server Mobile 被限制只能运行在 Tablet PC 上。SQL/e 就是解除了这个限制的版本。SQL/e 因此能运行在台式 Windows 上。
SQL/e 计划在 2006年下半年发布。 Steve 演示了目前如何在 VS 2005 中试验开发的和可以通过 ClickOnce 安装的办法。
这就解决了一个版本 WB Editor 的数据库选择问题。 本来正在犹豫是否应该用 SQL Server 2005 Express (SQL/x)。这个家伙 55M，还需要 Admin 用户权限才能安装。 比较 SQL/x 和 SQL/e，SQL/e 才 1.4M。看来SQL/e 更加适合 WB Editor 3.0。
Daniel Cazzulino 讲的内容也很有用，将会在下一篇笔记内介绍。
Add comment May 8th, 2006
An icon in the system tray kept poping up a notification saying “Your computer is infected! …”. If clicked the message, it opens the browser and connects to spywarequake.com.
Scanned with Windows Defender and Windows Live Safety Center, they could not find anything …
Finally used the old Spy tool to catch that popup’s class name is “ballon window”. Then searched DLL to find out suprox.dll. In the registry:
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{AC1B4DA2-12FA-31F2-1A7D-CD2B14E6AD4E}\InProcServer32]
@=”C:\WINDOWS\system32\suprox.dll”
“ThreadingModel”=”Apartment”
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\
CurrentVersion\Explorer\SharedTaskScheduler]
“{AC1B4DA2-12FA-31F2-1A7D-CD2B14E6AD4E}”=”USB Mouse Driver”
SharedTaskScheduler!, a new place to watch out.
Tags: system tray spyware malware spy tool clsid popup SharedTaskScheduler Your computer is infected
Add comment April 15th, 2006
Server Side
1. IIS Configuration - Directory Security Tab of Site / Virtual Root Properties
2. Web.config
<authentication mode=”Windows” />
<authorization>
<deny users=”?” />
</authorization>
<identity impersonate=”true” />
3. NTFS Security Tab of the physical folder
Client Side (IE)
Add comment March 7th, 2006
Flickr 是免费的图片发布和分享网站。最近被收购到 yahoo 旗下。
把图片存在 Flickr 然后连接到自己的 blog 中 是个很不错的做法。
WB Editor 2 已经支持直接上传图片到 Flickr 了。另外还会有一个插件，来管理和检索图片。
1 comment December 10th, 2005
开发个 Biztalk 系统真是颇费周折。记下一些经验备用。
1. Error about enlisting DTC.
Solution:
1) Turn off the RPC security on your Windows Server 2003 computers.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;839187
2) Turn off DTC authentication.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;884623
Error Messages:
Failed to execute SQL Statement. Please ensure that the supplied syntax is correct. An error occurred while enlisting in a distributed transaction.
2. Unable to deploy early bindings… Access is denied.
Solution: Add user id / group to Biztalk Admin group and SSO admin group
Error Messages:
[Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.DeploymentException] Unable to deploy early bindings.
[Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.Binding.BindingException] Failed updating binding information.
BindingException: Could not store transport type data for Primary Transport of Send Port ‘xxSendPort’ to config store. Access is denied.[Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM.BtsException] Could not store transport type data for Primary Transport of Send Port ‘xxSendPort’ to config store. Access is denied.
3. Event Log is full of ENTSSO events?
Solution: C:Program FilesCommon FilesEnterprise Single Sign-Onssoconfig -backupsecret mybackup.bak
Error Messages:
The master secret has not been backed up. If you lose the master secret all the information stored in the SSO system will be lost permanently and your systems may fail to work correctly. Please use the SSO admin tools to back up your master secret.
4. Cannot deploy without strong name
Solution: Assign strong name from within the BizTalk project’s properties window.
Error Messages:
[Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.DeploymentException] Unable to install the “….dll” assembly into the Global Assembly Cache. Exception: A strongly-named assembly is required.
[Microsoft.BizTalk.Gac.GacException] A strongly-named assembly is required.
5. Cannot Access Schema Based Message’s Property in the Expression Editor
Solution: Open the XSD, right click the property name, select Promote | Show Promotions ..
Promote the properties to be distinguished.
Add comment November 18th, 2005
搞定 支持 aspx 语法的 Template 引擎 后即开始编写 template以及试验从 windows forms 程序传递数据。在我的设计标准中，数据结构 Custom Object 有先于 DataSet，一般尽量避免 late-bound data binding：
< %#="" databinder.eval(container,="" "dataitem.title")="" %="">
而是建议 bind to cutom object：
< %#="" ((wbeditor.post)="" container.dataitem).title="" %="">‘>
asp.net web 系统是应该这么做的，但是用在 Template 引擎 中有个问题：asp.net host 固定要到 bin 目录下去找包含 WBEditor.Post 类定义的 DLL。从程序发布 (depolyment) 的观点来看，不是很舒服的结构。这种情况下 late-bound data binding 就很有用了。它不要依赖于 DLL，而是在 run-time 通过 reflection 去取值。
有趣的是 DataBinder.Eval 不仅仅能对付 Container.DataItem，还能用在 object 上。< %#="" databinder.eval(post,="" "createddate",="" "d")="" %="">
1 comment March 28th, 2005
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
